Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Test entry to test RapidBlog syncing.  Disregard.

Sunday, October 23, 2011

How to solve your spam problem

Spam is like venereal disease. You don’t get VD from sitting on a toilet seat. You get it by doing something dumb.
It’s the same with spam email. If you get it, it’s because you engaged in unsafe computing behavior.

Maybe you posted your email “in the clear” on a website where spambots could find it. These are electronic web crawlers that copy every string of letters that have an @ in the middle of them and add them to the spammers’ email lists.
Or perhaps you got a spam email and naïvely clicked the “remove me from the list” link, which perversely merely tells the spammer that you’re a valid address, so you’ll get even more spam.
Once you’re on a spammer’s list, you will never, ever, ever get off.
Spammers sell their lists to each other and they combine them willy-nilly without doing the “merge/purge” or list-cleaning functions that any legitimate postal mass mailer will use.
Spam exists only because email is free. If spammers find only one pinhead out of 100,000 people who falls for their phony spiels and sends in ten dollars, they make a profit because those other 99,999 emails cost them nothing.
(I don’t want government interference in the web, but it’s worth noting that if every email cost just one penny, it would be an insignificant cost to individuals, but spam would disappear overnight.)
Spammers are clever criminals. When banished from one ISP (Internet Service Provider), they’ll jump to another — or pay bribery to a corrupt one.
And before you whine about “junk mail” in your real mailbox, you’d better understand that if direct mail, catalogs, and magazines weren’t subsidizing the Postal Service, you’d be paying through the nose to mail that occasional letter to Aunt Matilda. The U.S. Mail only works because of volume. (Have you sent an envelope by FedEx lately? That’s what your stamp would cost.)
In case you were wondering, the magic number for snail-mail direct mailers is 2%. If at least two out of every hundred people don’t respond to their solicitation, it’s stopped because it’s uneconomic. This guarantees that in addition to postal “junk” mail helping support the Postal Service, only mailings for products or services that fulfill a legitimate need will survive.

The good, the bad, and the ugly.

THE GOOD news is that you can be spam-free. I get at most one or two spam emails a month, and it’s been that way for five years. I don’t even have my ISP’s spam filter turned on!
THE BAD news is that to get to this state, you will need to change your email address and start fresh. You can never make a tainted email address clean again.
THE UGLY “solution” is that some people clumsily force their correspondents to go through machinations to “register” their email addresses. This is like making all your friends get tested for AIDS because of behavior you engaged in. It is especially nettling because many web users have multiple email addresses that we send from, forcing us to jump through your hoops over and over again.
Yes, it’s a pain to let all your friends know you’ve changed your email. But if you do it right, you only need to do it once. (And most of you could use a shorter or more memorable address anyway. Take a few minutes to try some different ones, and don’t use whatever number-jumble your ISP throws at you as the default.)

The points below are common-sense explanations of why you get spam and what you should do to avoid it in the future.


The content is from http://gnwda.org/nospam.htm
I have deleted their point #18 because it’s a hustle for a paid spam-blocking service. Only a fool pays to block spam. All the tools you need are your ISP’s spam filters and your own common sense.

Note: Mac users can easily configure a “bounce” button on their Apple Mail toolbar. This will send it back to the sender as an invalid address. But it’s merely a more sophisticated option. Hitting the delete key works for any email application.


1. Be private. Do not give out your email address in the first place. In many instances if you are required to give your email address in order to receive something off a website, give an email address that you have set up specifically to receive junk. Some people then choose “nospam@----“ for their private address.
2. You can also set up a fake email address at such places as hotmail.com or yahoo.com; these email accounts are free.
3. Look for options to opt out of receiving promotional mailings when you have to give your address.
4. Preview all email by reading their subject lines before opening the mail. If you’re using an email program, such as Outlook, use the “View” menu to set the “Layout” to show only the subject lines, so you can select what you want to delete without opening the mail. Treat every email you preview as being of a suspicious nature. Many harmless-looking emails with attachments may contain viruses. Many people succumbed to the “I love you” email that contained a virus.
5. When you receive a forwarded email asking for help or money from someone, and in return you will have eternal good luck (or bad luck if you don’t forward it), do not forward it on. It is likely to be a hoax and is a great way for spammers to cultivate email addresses. Many virus warning emails are a hoax as well. You should research virus warnings before telling your friends about it so you don’t spread the hoax to them. (Research only takes a minute; see “Viruses, Legends &  Lies”)
6. When forwarding emails to groups of people, send them via the BCC field; this shields their address from others. Ask others to send emails to you this way, too.
7. Use the filters function, if your email program or service provides them, to filter out unwanted emails that do or do not meet certain criteria.
8. Keep your name off mailing lists, chat rooms and newsgroups by not giving out your correct address in the first place.
9. If your email address is on a website, ask your web designer to transform it in to a picture or change the @ sign to #  so that it’s not recognized by the ‘robots’ that come to steal email addresses for mailing lists.
10. Many spam messages have instructions at the bottom of the message asking you to reply to the message if you want to be removed from their mailing list. Don’t do this, as it will only confirm that your address is valid and active and you will most likely be hit with more spam.
11. Check the email address of the sender: Do you recognize it?
12. Watch out for fake headers. These are in the subject line and are commonly “Dear Friend.....” or “Here’s the information you requested.”
13. Never buy anything from a spammer’s email, even if it is something you want, as it is likely to be fraudulent.
14. You can complain to the spammer’s internet service provider by sending an email to abuse@ [the domain] or postmaster@ [the domain].
15. Don’t reply to contests in your email or offers of free websites, nor send money to anti-spam organizations, as they are most likely hoaxes.
16. Don’t submit your address to Opt-out or removal lists, as these are a hoax and you will end up getting more spam.
17. Be sure to have antivirus software installed on your computer. While you may be able to recognize an email with a strange attachment without opening it, a picture or Word document may harbor also a virus.

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

How to tell civilization is ending

There's a commercial running for a Playstation game called "Mafia II."

A music track by Dean Martin plus game animation of people shooting each other with tommy guns, ending with a POV shot from a grave as dirt is being tossed in by mafia goons.

Tuesday, August 17, 2010

Coke is so phat, NOT

This bus signage "Coke is so phat" appeared in NYC about twenty years ago, as I recall, done by some tactical marketing outfit in a vain attempt to make Coca-Cola relevant to the Gen-Xers, or whichever alphabetized and lobotomized group was presumed to dominate then.

"Phat" is a term from the 70's, which I naturally despised the first time I encountered it, combining as it did antiphrasis in its clumsiest form with the purposeful misspelling common to the hip-hop underclass.

But more to the point, could anything be less sexy, less cool, less "in" than Coca-Cola, the most lowbrow fizz-water of the twentieth century?

its presence is so ubiquitous, its very existence so mundane, one cannot imagine how it could suffuse society more thoroughly short of a mandatory intravenous drip in every citizen.

But so profound is the conceit of large marketers that once having bought every GRP, having saturated every commercial venue, they desperately seek to implant their lugubrious pretenses of importance into the most primitive reptilian segments of the brain.

And their ad agencies, palsied with fear of losing the business, partner with the latest purveyors of marketing flimflams — assuming, that is, that the client hasn't already beaten a path to these thimble-riggers.

The mundane nature of a soft drink makes it impervious to becoming a social marker.  It is fool's errand to fatuously attempt to transform it into something other than a sugary substance to swill down.

~~~
n.b.:  It goes without saying that I loathe the very structure of this post's headline, tacking "not" on the end in a ham-handed attempt to connote sarcasm or irony.

"Ironic" itself is a term feebly appropriated by the young (most of whom would be hard pressed to properly define it) as their dominant weltschmerz.  The more accurate descriptor would be cynical.    

Monday, July 5, 2010

Obituary: MS dumps Kin phone after 2 months

When I saw the first TV ads for the Kin, I was intrigued by its attempt at cloud computing, seamless syncing, and winning the Gen-X crowd.
Still, it always makes for painful watching when Microsoft tries to be "cool." One imagines Bill Gates in his plaid shirt trying to boogie.
The early reviews pointed out enormous gaps in the device, and (oops) the fact it only connects at 15-minute intervals:
http://www.pcworld.com/article/194262/the_curious_thing_about_microsoft_kin.html
After MS killed it after just two months, the Wall Street Journal's obituary noted confusion over its purpose and the high usage fees:
http://online.wsj.com/video/digits-mossberg-on-microsoft-kin-demise/44138782-3925-4F33-A15C-A7B6CA9BF860.html?KEYWORDS=Kin+mobile+phone
Now MS is trumpeting their upcoming "Windows Phone 7" and hoping all the people who got stuck with these orphan Kims will just go quietly into the night.
And paradoxically, after all their failures in this specialized market, their plan is to even be more rigid at trying to fob a "Windows" experience onto the user:
According to Microsoft, hardware partners will not be able to replace the Windows 7 UI. So if you're a fan of HTC's TouchFLO user interface, which runs over older versions of HTC Windows Mobile phones, you're out of luck.
Will they become competitive this time around? Consider words of wisdom from MS head Steve Ballmer in the past:

"There's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance."

Ballmer on the iPhone

""We wouldn't define our phone experience just by music. A phone is really a general purpose device," he summarized. "You want to make telephone calls, you want to get and receive messages, text, e-mail, whatever your preference is."

Ballmer on the iPhone

Tuesday, June 1, 2010

Old cartoonist techniques

Opening boxes in the attic tonight, I found a cache of stuff from high school, when I was taking the Art Instruction ("draw the puppy") correspondence course.
BAesides assorted Strathmore and tracing pads, I found the now-extinct Craftint Doubletone illustration board. (Maybe there are even the chemicals for it in the bottom of the box.)
Somewhere I also have a supply of coquille board (for use with grease pencil for tone behind drawn or inked linework), a favorite of editorial cartoonists thirty to fifty years ago.
These are things nobody knows about nowadays, but in olden days were dark secret tricks of the trade for reproduction. Zip-a-tone hadn't event been invented, I don't think.
My attic is a virtual Smithsonian of graphic history.
If only I could charge admission.
ghksigSMALL.jpg
http://huggy-lugnuts.deviantart.com/journal/28977327/
http://micomics.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=Ink&action=display&thread=115
Also, on Roy Crane, the doubletone master:
http://books.google.com/books?id=sb374j7kI1sC&pg=PA88&lpg=PA88&dq=craftint+illustration+board&source=bl&ots=kCvRNbDyvc&sig=1jnhmoIarBIuHJc6L8uhCXSWMaI&hl=en&ei=FLEETMT4EpO4NrTfzDs&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CB4Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=craftint%20illustration%20board&f=false

Friday, May 28, 2010

Kudos to the new Hewlett-Packard commercials

Some commercials are bulletproof. They work on some level, no matter how ham-handedly they're executed.
But others, often the most imaginative, are like soufflés. They have to be perfect, or they fail completely.
There's a charming new campaign for Hewlett-Packard wihere a Brit-accented fellow is questioning other characters, sometimes nonsensically, but always enough to engender a selling point.
The dialogue isn't haw-haw, just subtly humorous.
And it benefits from the most deft bit of casting I've seen recently, finding a guy who is the perfect equivalent of Eric Idle, the wink-wink-nudge-nudge guy in Monty Python, shown above.
The character is silly, bumptious, naïve, and ingratiating, all at the same time.
With the wrong —or even average— casting, the campaign would fall on its face. But it's executed perfectly. Which was the minimum requirement.